3 ms·
>I have a super-old MacBook Pro, “early 2009” Core 2 Duo, that is still working pretty ok till now, after having boosted RAM to 8Gb and disk with an SSD. With a
by sickbeard 10y ago
>I have a super-old MacBook Pro, “early 2009” Core 2 Duo, that is still working pretty ok till now, after having boosted RAM to 8Gb and disk with an SSD. With a lifetime of 7 years and half, having kept all my previous laptop maximum 3 years, this is the longest living computer I ever had, more than twice.
remember he hasn't actually used the new Macbook pro.. or the new surface book. He's just basing this on the old versions of the laptop and adding his own thoughts to it
- noja 10y agoHow do you know he hasn't used them?
- sickbeard 10y agoBecause the Macbook pro 2016 has been announced but not released and for the surface book here is what he said "Processing Power This is difficult to do a fair comparisons, especially when comparing prices later, because, while for the MacBook Pros we know exactly their clock speed and if they are dual-core or quad-core, there are no specs for the new Surface Book. I read somewhere they used the same processors of the previous model, so dual-core i5 2.4Ghz and dual-core i7 2.6Ghz. Which is more than the revamped MBP whose i5 is 2.0Ghz and i7 is 2.4Ghz, but (much) less than the new models which have an i5 with 2.9Ghz and i7 up to 3.3Ghz and even a quad-core i7 2.9Ghz for the 15”. Winner: MacBook Pro" relevant portion: there are no specs for the new Surface Book. I read somewhere they used the same processors of the previous model
- Mike_D_Brooks 10y agohttp://www.windowscentral.com/new-surface-book-configuration-core-i5-and-512gb-storage-pre-order- http://www.windowscentral.com/new-surface-book-configuration... This is one updated SKU, but by the looks of it you are right. They are using the same CPU.