4 ms·
I don't think the main takeaway is about writing by hand. A word processor is fine too. What's important here is the act of "active writing" vs "passive writing
by _chu 10y ago
I don't think the main takeaway is about writing by hand. A word processor is fine too. What's important here is the act of "active writing" vs "passive writing".
Franklin's method forces you to create writing (instead of just ingesting it) and then gives you specific feedback on whether you succeeded or failed (through comparison to the original).
The dissect-chunking-integrate-feedback model works everywhere, and what fascinates me is that Franklin figured it out through his own experiments.
- dasboth 10y agoFor distraction-free writing, instead of a word processor I recommend Draft[0]. [0]https://draftin.com/ https://draftin.com/
- dangerbird2 10y agoPandoc is also a easy way to write markdown in a distraction-free editor and compile to docx, PDF, or latex
- drhayes9 10y agoI dig Ulysses for the Mac[0]. Its distraction-free mode is very nice, but the organizational tools are there once you need to start stringing together larger pieces of text. I do wish someone would make a non-OSX version that was as nice. [0]https://ulyssesapp.com/ https://ulyssesapp.com/
- crooked-v 10y agoUlysses really bothers me because it's not "real" Markdown, so simple stuff like copy-pasting something with a link in it breaks.
- Tallain 10y agoHave you heard of Scrivener? It's available for both OSX and PC, and I believe there's an iOS version, too. It's really wonderful. The organizational tools are just incredible, and are only as complicated and involved as you want them to be.
- drhayes9 10y agoWhoa, missed this. Sorry for the late reply. I have! I like Scrivener as well and it's very powerful but its "does everything" functionality has led to some bloat in the UI department. Ulysses seems more thoughtfully designed but doesn't have the same breadth of features.
- tersiag 10y agoDraftin is a great. I often use the Hemingway writing mode (no backspace or delete). I make the browser full screen, switch off the spell checker, and just write.
- throwawayReply 10y agoI don't mind the concept of a third party hosted document editor, after all I use google docs. But what does irritate is that the site has dozens of third party scripts, including passing on your email to "intercom" and a bunch of other trackers without hashing it or using a different tracker Id. So you not only have to trust the content to Draft, you have to trust it to a dozen third parties with which you have no relationship. And to achieve nothing you can't achieve by setting your preferred text editor to full screen. Heck set your taskbar to "auto-hide" and notepad.exe can replicate what you've got there.
- dasboth 10y agoHmm interesting, I hadn't thought of looking at the scripts and such, thanks for the heads up. I do like the interface (the distraction-free and Hemingway modes as someone else mentioned) but I don't like the idea of my data being leaked. A desktop-based approach for drafts might make more sense as you say.
- panglott 10y agoMy main point was about how Franklin's methods used a lot of tedious overwork. Hand-copying is an illustrative aspect of that, yes, but memorizing the text of an Italian grammar book is of similarly limited value even if you are using Anki and distration-free writing software to do it.