59 ms·
Single page: http://www.slate.com/id/2250793/pagenum/all/ http://www.slate.com/id/2250793/pagenum/all/
by RevRal 16y ago
Single page: http://www.slate.com/id/2250793/pagenum/all/ http://www.slate.com/id/2250793/pagenum/all/
- BrandonM 16y agoDo we really need these for every multi-page article? I mean, on this one in particular you read down to the bottom of the first page and see: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | SINGLE PAGE Clicking SINGLE PAGE even puts us at the correct position in the single-paged article! When I saw the link though, I couldn't help laughing to myself and thinking, "I should be one of those karma dudes who posts 'Single Page:' as a comment." Then I checked out the comment thread and here it is. Who votes these up? Don't we all know by now that clicking the "Print this article" or "Single page" link on a multi-page article will transport us to that magical single page? (In case you're wondering, I didn't vote the parent down.)
- aristus 16y agoI hear you, but I think it's more protest/irony than information. Page-breaking is a cheap trick to inflate page views, borne of the same low cunning that gives us items priced at $2.98 instead of $3. When I'm reading HN on a phone or other high-latency environment I appreciate saving the extra roundtrip.
- BrandonM 16y agoFair enough, thanks for answering my question. FWIW, I wouldn't have made my comment if I couldn't have made it (I hope!) a little humorous. I'm in an especially comment-y mood tonight, and I've often wondered why these "Single page" posts are so popular and if they stuck out to anyone else. I find the automatic-karma-race nature of such posts (analogous to the classic xkcd new-comic-insta-submissions on reddit) somewhat intriguing. That is, such posters are obviously being helpful, but in the back of your mind you can't help but question their motivation.
- RevRal 16y agoI'd prefer that the submitters submit the full page stories or printer friendly versions as the submission. Posting the single page link in the comments is friendly. I also check the comments on HN before clicking the submission link, as there is often a full page link, which always makes me happy. (The comments also tell me whether if I should take the time to actually check the submission out) I kind of had the feeling that someone is jumping to the karma conclusion. Woe. Woe, I dare to say. ---- Addendum: Oh, and if I said I didn't appreciate the karma, I'd be lying. The +3 boost this is giving me puts me at 660, and I'm annoyed when my karma isn't divisible by 5. (I'm serious) Otherwise I don't really care. In fact, I often post riskier comments if my overall karma isn't divisible by 5. If I was at 901, and someone somewhere downvoted me to 900, it would make me happy. So please don't screw up my karma, you'll make me sad.
- BrandonM 16y agoThe "karma" comment was a joke, one that had the possibility of having some truth to it. I didn't assume any ill will :) --- Addendum: I do appreciate that "divisible by 5" quirk you mentioned :). My quirk seems to be that I don't really consider my comments complete until I've reread and edited them something like 5-10 times. I thinks that's why it makes me kind of sad when my shortest comments (e.g. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1283979 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1283979 and http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1219118 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1219118) are the ones that get the most upvotes... I spend so little time on those comments, as compared to one like http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1284130 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1284130.
- RevRal 16y agoIt's fine. I also remembered that I hate touching my mouse, and I prefer to keep my ring finger on "page down" when reading on a computer. Having to physically lift my hand, move it to the mouse, find the cursor on the screen, aim it at "next page" or whatever then click, and if I misfire... start over. This really breaks my flow and is quite disruptive. I know I'm not the only one who cares about stuff like this.
- klipt 16y ago
- brianmckenzie 16y agoSorry, that was an oversight on my part.