3 ms·
I hear this logic but dont buy it. Yes many western countries were polluting heavily during the industrial age, but that was using the best technology that exis
by Gustomaximus 10y ago
I hear this logic but dont buy it. Yes many western countries were polluting heavily during the industrial age, but that was using the best technology that existed at the time. The world now knows better about these harmful environmental practices, and has access to better tech to avoid this. If you apply this thinking that 'its what the other countries did previously' that's fine but then you do you expect developing continues not to utilise computers and other new technology for 50 years while they catch up? You cant have it both ways or your just cherry picking what suits your bias.
I feel the better arguement is that per capital these countries are lower polluters and we need to all strive to reduce pollution to an acceptable per-capita level. And as a global population need to look at how we lift everyone lifestyle while reducing environmental harm. This 'you had your turn polluting the world and now it's mine' lacks logic and will not solve the problem.
- capisce 10y ago> The world now knows better about these harmful environmental practices, and has access to better tech to avoid this Except the better tech tends to be more expensive and less labor intensive. A country with a huge cheap labor force would handicap itself by not using the most cost effective means to grow their economy, negative externalities notwithstanding.
- saiya-jin 10y agowhich doesn't make it right in any way - caring only about "me", "now", and not "us" and "tomorrow" Or in other words - it explains it, but doesn't justify it. We as mankind can do better
- M_Grey 10y agoThe problem is that people don't really exist as a "We, mankind"... we exist as various competing nations and other divided groups. It's laughable to think that what's good for "We, mankind" in the US is somehow good for "We, mankind" in North Africa, or China, or India.