>Others don't have the obligation to protect what you think is your right. True, but they also don't have a moral right to violate my rights. If the governmen

>Others don't have the obligation to protect what you think is your right. True, but they also don't have a moral right to violate my rights. If the government merely stopped protecting private property from aggressive seizure, that would be one thing. But thanks to "social democracy" (demagogic democracy), the government has become the primary instrument by which people aggressively seize the property of others. >If most people disagree with you, it's not self evident. I disagree that most people disagree with me. Most people do not consider the steps involved in money that someone earns going into their own bank account thanks to government intervention. If they did consider it, I believe it would be self-evident to most what property rights are, and that violating them is an authoritarian infringement upon human rights.