4 ms·
Say you make a new kind of drug, the government is allowed to regulate it and prevent you from selling it. That doesn't oblige the government to compensate you
by hiharryhere 10y ago
Say you make a new kind of drug, the government is allowed to regulate it and prevent you from selling it. That doesn't oblige the government to compensate you for making something dangerous.
- tomohawk 10y agoIf its dangerous, then it is not a drug. EDIT: If its only dangerous.
- achievingApathy 10y agoPlenty of drugs can be dangerous if they are misused and not properly regulated. You can grow poppies in your backyard, as long as you don't know/expect to milk them for opium.
- syshum 10y agoI am 100% against regulation of Drugs, and the War on drugs so I would say no.. But even under current laws, if you make a new drug the government must go through a process to make it regulated and classify it. It is not automatically illegal. By default all things are LEGAL until they are made ILLEGAL, not the other way around. The one exception to this is Medication, where in order to claim it treats as specific illness it must be approved by the FDA to treat that illness, the drug itself if not illegal per say, it just can not be proscribed by a doctor to treat X until it is approved to do so. Further even in the regulations of Dangerous drugs they do not prevent someone from finding a market in other nations for them. There are a whole host of medications that have been not been approved by the FDA that are sold in other nations.