16 ms·
You'll see most economists advocating a consumption tax, instead. I'm not sure what the difference is between a consumption tax and a sales tax. The corpora
by dibujante 10y ago
You'll see most economists advocating a consumption tax, instead.
I'm not sure what the difference is between a consumption tax and a sales tax.
The corporate tax should be 0%. No, I'm not kidding; hear me out.
Corporations aren't people; they don't ever actually pay taxes. People pay taxes. Yes, I know corporations are legal entities, but they're owned and managed by people, somewhere down the line. Those are the people the corporate tax is intended to target.
Presumably, the "goal" here is to get the corporations with scale economies, negotiation power, etc. to be taxed and use this to redistribute economic gains.
But what happens is that instead the burden of these taxes fall onto the shoulders of non-management workers in the firms and the people who buy what the firm produces. Because the incidence of a tax is indirectly distributed by a mechanism which depends itself on the negotiation power of the actors in the system.
Pretty much. I don't remember where I read it but I did read a study of corporate tax in the USA over the past few decades that found that increases in corporate tax were almost entirely born by non-management employees and consumers.
- TheSpiceIsLife 10y agofound that increases in corporate tax were almost entirely born by non-management employees and consumers. This seems tautological to me. Of course increases in corporate tax are born by non-management employees and consumers. Take Management + Non-management + Customers as a group, then Management represent approximately 0% of this group. Also, Non-management + Customers aren't in a position to change the flow of money through the corporation to shield themselves from changes to taxation. For the majority of corporations their income comes from consumer spending. In those cases it's always the consumer who pays.
- VodkaHaze 10y agoYou forgot the owners of the company. Presumably taxing the company would equate taxing them, which is separate from workers. But such is not how tax incidence works.
- TheSpiceIsLife 10y agoIndeed, yes. The owners are in the best position to avoid paying more tax.