4 ms·
I would pay $23-35 / month for ESPN, if offered. I mostly have a full cable package for this channel, and it costs a lot more than that. ESPN has a lot of jun
by jly 10y ago
I would pay $23-35 / month for ESPN, if offered. I mostly have a full cable package for this channel, and it costs a lot more than that.
ESPN has a lot of junk on it these days, but they've used their popularity to secure massive amounts of TV rights across a number of sports, most notably college football this time of the year. As a big fan, it's worth that much to me. I think it would be to others, as well.
- jelled 10y agosling.com includes espn along with a few other channels for only $20 a month.
- sudobear 10y agoThis is the chief reason I subscribe to Sling TV. It might not be widely known, but you can activate the WatchESPN app with your Sling credentials. This is great because the quality of experience watching tv on the ESPN app is way better than on the Sling app, which — at least for me, on the Apple TV — sometimes has pretty bad buffering problems.
- mathgeek 10y agoThe buffering problems are universal for me, and limited to Sling. I've seen them on AppleTV, Xbox One, and PS4.