3 ms·
"Dividing revenue by employee gives us a better look at which companies are the most efficient. And that’s what you see in the chart at the top of this post."
by vtail 16y ago
"Dividing revenue by employee gives us a better look at which companies are the most efficient. And that’s what you see in the chart at the top of this post."
craigslist's numbers are misleading here. Sure, they're extremely efficient by the above metric, because they were lucky enough to become a de-facto standard marketplace. I challenge anybody to find another example of a software company with 30 employees that is nearly as successful.
MSFT revenue per employee is $631k, between eBay and Facebook.
Source: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=microsoft+revenue+/+number+of+employees http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=microsoft+revenue+/+num...
(PS. Do I deserve extra karma for posting this cool WolframAlpha link ? :)
- maukdaddy 16y agoHow is CL misleading? They make a shitload of money with very few employees. Saying they were lucky isn't even relevant to the argument. Based on revenue per employee, they are fantastically efficient. MSFT was "lucky" enough to become the de-facto standard in their market, yet they aren't as efficient as CL.