4 ms·
Your analogy is poor, not just because neither Buffet nor Gates are short. I agree that the author's list of companies was selective, and a larger list would ha
by DilipJ 16y ago
Your analogy is poor, not just because neither Buffet nor Gates are short. I agree that the author's list of companies was selective, and a larger list would have provided more insight. But revenue per employee is an important metric for understanding the scalability of a company.
- vtail 16y agoI agree with you that my analogy is poor, and that revenue per employee is an important metric. My point was that showing craigslist there is misleading, for the reasons I listed in my other comment. It still amazing how well Google scales, and comparing it to craigslist shadows this fact.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]