3 ms·
Pretty sure web enabled cameras are NOT pacemakers NOR rockets... heck they can't even put a different password on each device by printing on a sticker. Nor is
by grogenaut 10y ago
Pretty sure web enabled cameras are NOT pacemakers NOR rockets... heck they can't even put a different password on each device by printing on a sticker.
Nor is my sous vide machine or anything else I've seen as an IoT device. I wouldn't call say my oscilliscope an IoT device even if it can connect to wifi. It's a scientific device with cloud upload.
- kuschku 10y agoYou do realize pacemakers nowadays have WiFi and Bluetooth and run on the same platform as other IoT devices? There was an interesting talk at the Chaos Communications Congress a few years back.
- grogenaut 10y agoI'm well aware of this. I'm also aware that people are hacking these devices left and right. But a cow is a mammal and a mammal isn't a cow. Gp post was not talking about security we're talking about Real time computing. If it's running on IoT hardware, eg rpi running linux, it's likely not doing real time os stuff because linux isn't really a real time os. And I still don't classify pacemakers as IoT. Just because you want to slap a vague acyronym on any and every "connected" embedded device doesn't mean I agree.
- kuschku 10y agoBut that's the thing, there's now a trial for implanted, smart, insulin pumps, running on node.js, connecting to its app via WiFi. That stuff is IoT in every definition of the word.
- kpil 10y agoI know a few software developers that have diabetes, and they seem to be reluctant to automatic pumps. Monitoring might be fine, but installing something in the body that can kill you and then running it on node.js doesn't seem like a good idea.