I agree, but you proposed a stringent definition for 'Rule of Law' that seemed to eliminate the possibility of government regulators possessing independent deci

I agree, but you proposed a stringent definition for 'Rule of Law' that seemed to eliminate the possibility of government regulators possessing independent decision-making authority over citizens and businesses alike. I mean, how do even mundane things like zoning codes and work permits work in this universe where there are no regulators and gov't bureaucrats? Everything must go through a court? Why are you so sure a group of 12 random people will come to decisions more effectively than a bureaucrat in a domain that requires specialized knowledge? In any case, I fully agree that sometimes regulators, or regulations are bad. But this particular case is an example of regulation working as designed. The NHTSA has been at the forefront of working with the self-driving car industry to make sure there is a legal path to developing, testing, and releasing this tech. Textbook example of regulators doing their job without imposing undue burdens on the regulated industry.