3 ms·
I generally agree with your segmentation. Unfortunately Apple does not (well, not any more). And there is a huge contingent who still wants the thinnest possib
by slantyyz 10y ago
I generally agree with your segmentation.
Unfortunately Apple does not (well, not any more). And there is a huge contingent who still wants the thinnest possible Pro model.
I would suggest further breaking the Non-pro line into super thin (New Macbook) and thin (Macbook Air) models, and the Pro line into super thin (2016 rMBP) and not-so-thin (the model you describe).
- likeclockwork 10y agoThe problem here is that the thinnest possible Pro model is not Pro. You can call it Pro, but it's not Pro anymore.. it's Thin.