3 ms·
Regarding your edit that corruption is not apparent... it's pretty easy to argue she was trying to hide from public scrutiny and avoid transparency policies. I
by scintill76 10y ago
Regarding your edit that corruption is not apparent... it's pretty easy to argue she was trying to hide from public scrutiny and avoid transparency policies. I think it's fair to be concerned and upset about that, even if you think she wasn't doing anything outright wrong otherwise.
Also, exchanging sensitive, potentially-classified information on your own infrastructure when the usual policy is for the government to run it, comes off as arrogant, careless, and dismissive of safe/transparent operating procedures carefully designed by a combination of democracy and the bureaucracy -- again a valid cause for some of us to have concerns about someone who wants to be one of the most powerful leaders in the world. Or, we can just be worried about setting this precedent for people in high offices, even if we think this particular person is a benevolent, un-corrupted rule-breaker.