5 ms·
I agree with you, but I think she needs to be indicted if the e-mails prove her to be culpable. Ideally she will win the election, and if the e-mails prove damn
by vectorpush 10y ago
I agree with you, but I think she needs to be indicted if the e-mails prove her to be culpable. Ideally she will win the election, and if the e-mails prove damning she will be indicted and hopefully impeached and forced to resign, leaving Tim Kaine to finish off her term, which IMO would be the best case scenario for the country.
- williadc 10y agoImpeachment doesn't mean she will be forced to resign. Look at what happened with Bill Clinton. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
- vectorpush 10y agoI understand that, that's why I said "impeached AND forced to resign" :)
- maxerickson 10y agoIf the Senate convicts, the impeached individual is removed from office, they don't need to resign (and I guess won't save face by doing it once they are impeached).
- heurist 10y agoThat's pretty presumptive. The last FBI investigation into her emails went a year and found nothing. Given that she's been running for president the last decade or two and republicans will pounce on her over any little misstep, do you really think she'd intentionally do something that could ruin her chances of winning or staying president? Remember that intention is important in law...
- cmdrfred 10y ago>The last FBI investigation into her emails went a year and found nothing. Incorrect, they found no one who was "willing to prosecute"
- gragas 10y agoThese are independent events. Investigating for a year, handing out a bunch of immunity agreements and finding yourself out of people to prosecute says nothing about the new evidence at hand.
- vectorpush 10y agoIn what way is what I said presumptive?
- mywittyname 10y agoObama will pardon her a la Carter with Nixon.
- douche 10y agoFord