4 ms·
Maybe there's a reason, but why is this linked to webcache, and not jwz? Is this a common practice? edit: on topic, liked the article, thank you.
by ominous 10y ago
Maybe there's a reason, but why is this linked to webcache, and not jwz? Is this a common practice?
edit: on topic, liked the article, thank you.
- maxerickson 10y agoJWZ doesn't like an HN referrer and serves an image instead of the content.
- wyldfire 10y agoWow that is really odd. You'd think HN would be his kind of crowd (or at least I would think that). Does he have something against YC?
- rwmj 10y agoI don't know if this counts as an explanation, but: https://twitter.com/jwz/status/665658171415859200 https://twitter.com/jwz/status/665658171415859200
- clydethefrog 10y agoLook at Mozilla's manifesto [0] and compare that to what many YC companies are doing. It's all about centralization and commercial profit. [0] https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/ https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/
- wyldfire 10y agoI dunno if I'm representative of HN but I consider YC mostly orthogonal to HN. I don't care about what YC does, but I find the stories and comments of HN valuable regardless.
- clydethefrog 10y agoI think, according to jwz's tweets [0][1], he has a different opinion and sees HN as a community with a distinct ideology he does not want to have on his blog. Personally I I think he has a point there - whenever YC and politics is involved this community can become quite one-sided. See for instance the discussion about Thiel's donation to Trump. [0] https://twitter.com/jwz/status/665658278509084673 https://twitter.com/jwz/status/665658278509084673 [1] https://twitter.com/aaronbrethorst/status/657373602405154816 https://twitter.com/aaronbrethorst/status/657373602405154816
- hollerith 10y agoI would hesitate to use anything written by the current Mozilla Foundation as clues to what someone who left the organization in 1999 thinks. Source of the 1999 date: https://www.jwz.org/gruntle/nomo.html https://www.jwz.org/gruntle/nomo.html
- bd 10y agoBecause if you link to jwz's site directly from HN, you'll get redirected to this :) http://imgur.com/32R3qLv http://imgur.com/32R3qLv
- ominous 10y agoAhah nice.
- captainmuon 10y agoCurrently it links directly to the article, which is unfortunate. Could an admin maybe change it (back?) to use a webcache or a url shortener? (I know it is HN's policy to link only to the main URL, but I consider this referrer-sniffing to be a bug on jwz.org, or a failure condition like when the site is out of service due to traffic. In those cases, cache links are posted here frequently.)