3 ms·
The point is that one unsubstantiated anecdote cancels out the other. Why is the first comment okay but this one isn't? You can't have it both ways.
by SquareWheel 10y ago
The point is that one unsubstantiated anecdote cancels out the other. Why is the first comment okay but this one isn't? You can't have it both ways.
- vacri 10y agoThe comment I responded to was mockingly talking about dying with the original wasn't. It was being smarmy when the original was talking cleanly. Abusing someone for lack of science when you're being snarky is a footgun. My point is that if you are chiding someone for a lack of quality, you shouldn't use even less quality to do so.