4 ms·
You have it exactly backwards. Anyone suggesting Soylent is safe with arguments like "glucose is glucose" and "it has the right macronutrient ratios" is spouti
by benlambert 10y ago
You have it exactly backwards.
Anyone suggesting Soylent is safe with arguments like "glucose is glucose" and "it has the right macronutrient ratios" is spouting pseudo-science.
If you have insufficient evidence that something is safe and a strong anecdote suggesting otherwise the logical option is to abstain.
Attempting to bring science into the decision making process when the science has not been done is pseudo-science!
- webscaleizfun 10y agoThere is still so much science to do related to food, we just do not have a good grasp of all the nutrients your body needs and what allows you to absorb those nutrients the best. One form of protein from a plant can have completely different absorption rates than that of protein from a cow, its a complete crapshoot to try and blaze a trail with processed staple food products due to the lack of understanding we have of nutrition, and its going to take decades of research to even start to unravel the mysteries of the human bodies digestion system.
- nkozyra 10y ago> You have it exactly backwards. I would call either argument pseudo-science, but only one was presented here and it's the one I responded to.
- 9935c101ab17a66 10y agoThe person you're replying to didn't make any of the assertions you seem to be refuting. They didn't say "soylent is safe" or "glucose is glucose". They asked for academic evidence that long-term liquid diets later inhibit one's ability to properly digest solid food.