4 ms·

This pretty much seems reasonable. Housing demand should probably depend mostly on the amount of wealth (maybe this should be income?) in the area. It seems pos

by foota 10y ago

This pretty much seems reasonable. Housing demand should probably depend mostly on the amount of wealth (maybe this should be income?) in the area. It seems possible that wealth in the valley is growing at 20%.

mintyfresh 10y ago
20% growth would mean the wealth in the area would double every 3.46 years. This morning, it was announced that the US GDP grew at an annual rate of 2.9% last quarter, accompanied by the WSJ headline "US Economy Roars Back" [1]. 20% growth is nowhere near "reasonable". [1] http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-economy-grew-2-9-in-third-quarter-1477657992 http://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-economy-grew-2-9-in-third-qu...
- dilemma 10y ago
  Inflation, not growth. You get less house for the same money.
- foota 10y ago
  GDP is a measure of income, not wealth. It makes sense that wealth matters more for house prices than income, because it's a ~ one time purchase.