3 ms·
True that, it helped them get the funding and the interest so it was a great marketing strategy. But now that people understand the theory (ie you can supply so
by JauntyHatAngle 10y ago
True that, it helped them get the funding and the interest so it was a great marketing strategy. But now that people understand the theory (ie you can supply someone with all the nutrition they need from the one product) they are going a bit more on a sane sort of image.
Soylent makes perfect sense in the context of a meal replacer for busy or lazy people. But even the original creator stopped eating it at all times because he missed the "social aspect of eating".