3 ms·
As a developer and a digital artist I am often running multiple VMs, my various development tools and 2-5 Adobe products on top of my 2 browsers and other misc
by jonnyscholes 10y ago
As a developer and a digital artist I am often running multiple VMs, my various development tools and 2-5 Adobe products on top of my 2 browsers and other misc programs. Agreed that for any single piece of digital design software 16gb should be enough (even to a certain extent After Effects). But if I could have a high quality laptop, that runs Adobe software, is Unix-y AND run the whole Adobe suite plus my development tools... (whilst not having to close all my research notes in Firefox)... gee whizz would I throw my money at that.
I'm probably an outlier though so can understand why it doesnt exist.
- TheOtherHobbes 10y agoI don't think you're an outlier at all. 32GB is the absolute minimum I need to get my work done without disk thrashing. If I spent more time on video than audio I'd want 64GB. That's completely realistic for pro and semi-pro users. The cost of making a laptop that could take 32GB or even 64GB of RAM must be tiny. No one would care if Apple only supplied 16GB but left a couple of slots free, or even if the stock overpriced 16GB could be swapped for 32GB. Why cut corners and make "pro" machines that can't be used for professional work? It's counterproductive. It may increase margins in the short term, but over time it alienates users and erodes the appeal of the brand. It seems "Think Different" has become "Don't Expect Much."