3 ms·
Human beings aren't programs evaluating objective rules to come to an objective determination about raises and promotions. Your comment carries the implicit as
by sidlls 10y ago
Human beings aren't programs evaluating objective rules to come to an objective determination about raises and promotions.
Your comment carries the implicit assertion that folks with kids are given special treatment. But what you fail to show is that it actually is "special," except in the context where it is defined to be so.
- Consultant32452 10y agoThe context to which I was responding to was that in the article the women were suggesting that people who have children should be given special treatment. Things like, if you choose to work less because you have a child you should still get the same raises and promotions as someone who didn't choose to work less (regardless of whether they reproduced). Things like your employer arranging for emergency daycare for you if your kid is sick, or otherwise allocating company resources (space) for kids to hang out in when they're out sick from school.
- sidlls 10y agoYou're still defining that as special treatment. Why is that considered special treatment?
- Consultant32452 10y agoIn what way is expecting the same pay and promotions as someone who works more than you not asking for special treatment? I really don't understand what you could be missing there.