4 ms·
I disagree; with encapsulation, polymorphism, and composition, Rust seems OO enough to not make the term "meaningless". At least, not according to the widely u
by jjnoakes 10y ago
I disagree; with encapsulation, polymorphism, and composition, Rust seems OO enough to not make the term "meaningless".
At least, not according to the widely used definitions I've read of OO.
- belovedeagle 10y agoAll of these things are found in Haskell as well; it's not OO by any stretch of the imagination. You're confusing "oop language" with "modern programming language".
- jjnoakes 10y agohttps://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0509027 https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0509027