4 ms·
> In other words, we need to increase the supply of these research jobs, and make them more attractive then working in finance. That's a fair summary. My core
by tikhonj 10y ago
> In other words, we need to increase the supply of these research jobs, and make them more attractive then working in finance.
That's a fair summary. My core point was that it's far more a matter of constrained research positions rather than finance being so alluring. It's not hard to make a research position more attractive to most bright minds than finance: you just have to offer autonomy, a bit of prestige and working conditions that aren't absolutely terrible.
> certain jobs like proprietary trading are the equivalent of gambling
The proprietary trading firms I'm familiar tend to be risk averse and specialize in things like market making and arbitrage. This is probably some of the most unambiguously useful activity on the markets: it's companies like that that make things like ETFs and less liquid securities work efficiently. Without market makers, various useful but niche securities would be significantly more painful to trade in practice.
- JDiculous 10y agoI agree. Regarding prop trading, prop trading itself is the betting of the firm's own money for profit. I equated it to gambling because that's what it is. On a net basis, this doesn't really benefit society because it's essentially a zero sum game. Market making on the other hand does benefit society by providing/ensuring liquidity.
- consz 10y agoMost market makers are prop trading firms, though -- I think it's incorrect to act like these classifications aren't highly correlated.