3 ms·
Isn't any non-free, non-subscription service going to have to either put that barrier up or show ads? I may be misunderstanding your complaint, but it sounds r
by wutbrodo 10y ago
Isn't any non-free, non-subscription service going to have to either put that barrier up or show ads? I may be misunderstanding your complaint, but it sounds really bizarre to me, akin to:
"Jesus every time I want to go watch a movie at the theatre there's this obnoxious guy blocking my way asking to see my 'ticket'. I don't have to deal with this bullshit when I watch TV at home, I just turn it on and start watching content"/
- mangeletti 10y agoI think you need to go read the whole article. These guys are offering an ad blocker that ruins the ad revenue of websites and then offers the solution by also being a paywall.
- wutbrodo 10y agoI assume from your condescension that you read the article (or at least think you did), so the problem is presumably with your reading comprehension. As I said, some sort of wall is inherent to the solution (seamless micro transactions would have people, perhaps unfairly, claiming that they didn't realize they were spending money). The whole premise behind this project is to replace ads for people who don't like ads. It's laughable to claim that the banner informing people of that is an ad. Your complaint about ruining the web experience seems to be that it puts barriers in front of your browsing, and my point was that almost any solution that compensates content creators is going to suffer from this.
- mangeletti 10y agoI'm sorry I triggered you. I think that, if the purpose of the popup is to inform me about CoinTent, then can it be anything other than an ad? If the goal was to solve a problem, then CoinTent would be only the paywall, since ad blockers are already prolific.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]