4 ms·

> move files in the finder with 'cut' You can actually do this. Cmd + C to copy the file, then Cmd + Option + V to paste it and delete the original.

• oneeyedpigeon 10y ago
  You know what's better for 'move a file' than 'normal shortcut for copying something + brand new unique shortcut for paste-and-delete-original'? Cut and Paste. Using the same shortcuts as every other piece of software. Why, on earth, can't we just have that?
  • unclenoriega 10y ago
    Courage.
  • rayiner 10y ago
    "Cut" and "paste" is a bad abstraction for moving a file. When you "cut" text and then don't "paste" it's the same as deleting the text. You don't want that for files (it would be too easy to accidentally delete the file). In fact, Windows doesn't work that way--if you fail to paste, the original file will remain in its original location. Apple's abstraction is more honest to what is actually happening.
    • oneeyedpigeon 10y ago
      Why is accidentally deleting a file worse than accidentally deleting text? Some files, sure, but there should be safeguards about deleting those files anyway. Plus backups, always backups. In truth, I don't think many people are accidentally hitting that shortcut that often. And, if they are, so long as there's an action analogous to undo'ing a textual cut/copy/paste, it shouldn't be a problem.
    • WillPostForFood 10y ago
      That's purity getting in the way of practicality. Non-destructive cut with text isn't unfamiliar to anyone who has used a spreadsheet, so use that abstraction with files(like windows does).
    • ljk 10y ago
      seems to me Apple's implementation is just lazy... sent from my macbook