3 ms·
Indeed. Whatever his name is, used the fact that the FDA has to "authorize" a drug, which is more akin to an indefinite patent. Then again, the deeper we dig,
by kefka 10y ago
Indeed. Whatever his name is, used the fact that the FDA has to "authorize" a drug, which is more akin to an indefinite patent.
Then again, the deeper we dig, the more idiocy we see. How can we expect anyone to fix: insurance, pharmaceutical, device companies, FDA, AMA, government interference, medical schools - everyone has a part in the current system. And it is the combination of the worst that capitalism and socialism have to offer.
And yes, I misspelled his name, because a google search was too much work to get his name correct (marque of disregard). But admittedly, probably was not the best case to explain.