24 ms·
Neat. I wrote the same thing in Common Lisp a while back. Not sure if I put it on GitHub yet, but I'll do so tonight. I want to play with this OCaml version
by jlarocco 10y ago
Neat. I wrote the same thing in Common Lisp a while back. Not sure if I put it on GitHub yet, but I'll do so tonight.
I want to play with this OCaml version tonight also. I'm curious to see the performance difference. My guess is OCaml is faster initially, but adding type declarations and optimizations will give CL an edge.
- cedricbonhomme 10y agoThank you. I'll be happy to test your Lisp alternative! Typically OCaml has really good performance.
- ska 10y agoSo does common lisp. Fwiw, between the two I've found performance differences mostly due to experience of implementer, more than domain. YMMV of course.
- cedricbonhomme 10y agoIf you have a link, I'll be happy to gather several implementations. Thanks.
- jlarocco 10y agoSorry about that! Turns out I hadn't written it after all, or at least couldn't find it. A while back I made a little library of fractal drawing in Common Lisp, and thought it was there. In any case, it's written now: https://github.com/jl2/ifs-qt https://github.com/jl2/ifs-qt
- cedricbonhomme 10y agoThank you very much! I'll look your code right now!