3 ms·
English is a mess compared to programming languages. As a natural one it is one of the simplest. The "search and replace" tips given in the article would fail
by BoppreH 17y ago
English is a mess compared to programming languages. As a natural one it is one of the simplest.
The "search and replace" tips given in the article would fail in most languages. From the top of my head I can think of 4 different ways to say "There was" in Portuguese, and I bet there are many more.
Not that it's good or bad. It's just a characteristic.
- lmkg 17y ago> As a natural one [English] is one of the simplest. Strongly disagree. I think it's one of the most baroque, with too many special cases, irregulars, and gotchas. It doesn't have specific types of complexity. For example, its morphology[1] seems pretty bare, at least if you compare it to other Indo-European languages, but even there it's more complex than Japanese or native Hawaiian. To your point, that makes it mostly amenable to search-and-replace filters, which is convenient. [1] Changes to the word reflecting grammatical usage, such as "-ness" signifying a noun or "-ed" signifying a past tense. These are usually the bits of other languages that English-speakers think are "hard."