"wealthy individual donors and small businesses, along with drug policy advocacy groups, have funneled far more dollars to the opposition than casinos..." That

"wealthy individual donors and small businesses, along with drug policy advocacy groups, have funneled far more dollars to the opposition than casinos..." That seems a bit disingenuous when it goes on to say in the next sentence "Las Vegas casino magnate Sheldon Adelson is singlehandedly responsible for roughly one-third of all anti-legalization spending this year, a total of $3.5 million in three states so far." I understand that at a basic level, these are private individual donations, instead of donations from some lobbying group, but when that individual is designated a "casino magnate", does it even matter?