Surely those aren't good ones to compare against due to bias. A more fair way to judge would be to have people rate unknown artists' work as well as the machine

Surely those aren't good ones to compare against due to bias. A more fair way to judge would be to have people rate unknown artists' work as well as the machine output. Then see how that pans out over time. Judging from some of the stuff on display in galleries right now, I'd be shocked if machines can't outperform or match. And they'll only get better, right?