4 ms·
It'll almost have parity with Java once Core support .NET Standard 2.0. One admittedly unpopular area it'll be missing is options for desktop development. I kn
by rpeden 10y ago
It'll almost have parity with Java once Core support .NET Standard 2.0.
One admittedly unpopular area it'll be missing is options for desktop development. I know that the trend these days is to use web interfaces, and web development makes up about 95% of my professional life.
But just out of curiosity, I picked up a WPF book from the library. And as I was reading through it, I remember thinking how nice it would be to be able to develop web apps with something like that. I suppose Silverlight would've been close, but it's dead these days.
It looks like JavaFX is broadly similar to WPF over in Java-land, and it appears to work fairly well cross platform. It doesn't look native on any platform, but that isn't always a deal breaker. Using Intellij's non-native looking Swing UI on my MacBook doesn't bother me, though I appreciate that not everyone feels that way.
I suppose this is my roundabout way of saying I'd love to have a decent cross platform .NET GUI framework. For anyone who wants this too, Avalonia looks like a good project to follow: https://github.com/AvaloniaUI/Avalonia https://github.com/AvaloniaUI/Avalonia
It doesn't appear to support .NET Core yet, but last time I checked they expected to be able to relatively soon.
- pjmlp 10y agoI have been doing projects in the healthcare area. In what concerns computers to control robots, measurement devices and doing ETL data processing of data readers, on the projects I have been involved it is 100% Windows native WPF applications, with the legacy ones being a mix of MFC and Windows Forms.