3 ms·
The http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html is positioned to blow the doors off of this, FWIW
by astrostl 10y ago
The http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/e-m1-mark-ii.html is positioned to blow the doors off of this, FWIW
- jfindley 10y agoThat looks great! I'd love not to have to carry so much weight to carry around with me. I do wonder if it might still struggle to keep up with the controllability of the pro DSLRs, which I discussed in a different reply, but until I can actually try one that's likely to remain an open question.
- CWuestefeld 10y agoI responded to your above comment at [1] to say that I think the controls available in my OM-D E-M5ii are better than my DSLR. And t-he EM1ii will be taking the best parts of the E-M5ii and the E-M1. Basically, my experience is that the control surface of my E-M5ii is superior to that of my DSLR, especially in the area of autofocus. It also has some cool stuff that I've never heard of a DSLR doing. For example, my camera does exposure bracketing by automatically driving the autofocus servos; the E-M1 (and in the future, E-M1ii) take that to automatic in-camera focus stacking. I will say that every manufacturer seems to have a different approach to how their various exposure priority modes trade off. Like when I'm in Aperture priority, how much does it change Shutter vs ISO? I dislike how Olympus does that, and actually think that Pentax's heuristics are the best I've seen. My point, I guess, is that the control systems are always just something you have to learn to work with given the way you think about the camera operation. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12807091 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12807091