3 ms·
A short article, lacking in details. Interesting that they can state "72% year-on-year decline" when in fact the Apple Watch has been on sale for only about 18
by cyberferret 10y ago
A short article, lacking in details. Interesting that they can state "72% year-on-year decline" when in fact the Apple Watch has been on sale for only about 18 months. Not yet enough sales data to compare two complete sales years against each other.
In any case, this was discussed to death in another Smart Watch thread here on HN a day or so ago. My take on it is that that Smart Watches need way too much 'babying' (i.e. time and conscious energy) to keep them operational at this point in time, that the motivation to go back to 'dumb' devices that don't require so much thinking and planning to keep active is just too strong.