3 ms·
> > “She is a treacherous, lying, murderous woman that could care less of our rights and our constitution." > Basically, that statement about Hillary is 100%
by Singletoned 10y ago
> > “She is a treacherous, lying, murderous woman that could care less of our rights and our constitution."
> Basically, that statement about Hillary is 100% correct.
Okay, I'll bite on this. I accept that all politicians have lied (as has everyone else), so she's a lier.
I'd be genuinely interested to see any evidence that points to treachery, murder, or her not caring about rights or the constitution.
I'm not looking for 100% evidence here, just any evidence that strongly points in that direction. (With citations to other sources, obviously. Just saying she has killed people doesn't count).
- tomp 10y agoMurder - Benghazi (edit: not Benghazi, according to the commenter below), and she was Secretary of State when US attacked Libya. Plenty of murder happened there, and is still happening. Treachery - AFAIK, other people have been charged with treason for toying with Top Secret information like she has (sending it to/from insecure email addresses). Not caring about rights - she voted to build the Mexican wall (something Trump is often criticised for even suggesting), and said that US should "drone" Assange. (Technically, assuming the original commenter is a US citizen, that's not technically "our" rights, but given her statement about Assange, I'd imagine she'd also support "droning" of US citizens, as US has done in the past few years.) Not caring about the constitution - I don't really disagree with her here (I don't agree with her either - basically, it's complicated), but I guess you could frame her support for greater gun control as "not respecting the constitution".
- zimpenfish 10y agoMultiple (7 or 8) hostile inquiries cleared her of any culpability for Benghazi. Why do people persist in spreading this nonsense?