3 ms·
people,it's not the sensor why a dslr is the etalon, it's the lens you can put on them.
by pmlnr 10y ago
people,it's not the sensor why a dslr is the etalon, it's the lens you can put on them.
- mnw21cam 10y agoNot so. It's easy to make a really good small lens - the article mentions that the modern smartphone lenses are dirt cheap and diffraction limited. It's really hard to make a large lens diffraction limited. The advantage of the DSLR is the sensor.
- pmlnr 10y agoI wasn't suggesting a debate, rather stating a fact. Any sensor these days beats the sensor, for example, in a Nikon D100, yet the photos made with those machines with professional lens are still better than most the "really good" mini lens. Yes, you can mimic bits and pieces with software, sometimes, but in most cases there are decades of engineering behind the more expensive lens which will take a long while to be beaten. Diffraction is not the only issue you need to address in a lens, and not everything is easier to deal with when it's miniaturized. Besides, most "legendary" lens are actually loved for their mistakes and flaws in their optics.
- TeMPOraL 10y agoI think GP is referring to the ton of lenses you can buy and attach to your DSLR yourself. As for the sensor, if it's really that good, why nobody put one on a smartphone?
- throwanem 10y agoBecause it's 36x24mm in size and needs an optics bench (aka "lens") in front of it to produce a worthwhile image. You could put all that into a smartphone and have it work, but what you'd end up with would be a smartphone the size of a DSLR.
- grkvlt 10y ago> etalon: a device consisting of two reflecting glass plates, employed for measuring small differences in the wavelength of light using the interference it produces. Is this used in a DSLR? I know they use phase sensors for autofocus, but had never heard this term before.
- slantyyz 10y agoI think the poster meant etalon as in etalon-or, which is French for gold standard?