2 ms·
I've used CGAL extensively in the past and found the implemented algorithms to be of fantastic quality. The major pain points for me were also the really sub-pa
by droelf 10y ago
I've used CGAL extensively in the past and found the implemented algorithms to be of fantastic quality. The major pain points for me were also the really sub-par Python bindings. Which are actually worse now, since they've switched over to SWIG from Boost.Python.
If anyone ever needs Python bindings for CGAL that make sense, check my little pet project out: https://github.com/wolfv/pygal https://github.com/wolfv/pygal :)