4 ms·
It seems that a lot big players are betting fixed wireless for the urban market(instead of the smaller rural market) . It's probably the main purpose of 5G. And
by petra 10y ago
It seems that a lot big players are betting fixed wireless for the urban market(instead of the smaller rural market) . It's probably the main purpose of 5G. And there's some nice technical innovation(cohere promises to solve fading, tarana talks about working in urban non-line-of-sight) . And even LTE-A offers nice capacities in that context.
So why are you betting against it ?
- gm-conspiracy 10y agoBy its very nature, it is inherently more unreliable than a "wired" connection. Additionally, as usage of a particular endpoint increases, capacity for each individual user decreases proportionally. There was an article some days ago about how we used to get these amazing LTE speeds, but now they are horribly congested and feel like low-grade DSL.
- petra 10y agoI believe there are already places with fixed wireless services(austria or south-korea if i recall correctly) that looks competitive.