3 ms·

Sorry, I should have checked that. I took the title from a link in a curated news list. The actual title, "Spies for Hire", isn't useful. I'll change it to a ph

• schoen 10y ago
  Cool, that change makes more sense to me. I found the article interesting. It seems like the journalist struggled to find concrete, direct evidence that this company is engaged in the offensive work that she claims -- but found a very considerable amount of circumstantial evidence. I also appreciated that hackers were willing to talk about their concerns with doing this kind of work, and that the article mentions the way people might not know the nature of the work they (or their colleagues) might be asked to do at the time that they're hired.