I think WP:UNDUE is one of the most disruptive and misused rules on WP. It's a trump card for anyone experienced editor who favors deletion. It's intention wa

I think WP:UNDUE is one of the most disruptive and misused rules on WP. It's a trump card for anyone experienced editor who favors deletion. It's intention was as an equal time rule, where VIEWPOIONTS were balanced. Instead it is used anytime an editor thinks one section weighs too much, or personally doesnt find the information of value. The thing is, if I only have part to contribute to an article, it makes no sense to put my contribution on hold until other parts of the article flesh out, it becomes a catch22, self limiting the article. I think its pretty obvious I side with inclusion of just about everything. The belief in not letting part of an article grow until the other part does is asinine. If weight becomes imbalanced, write more. OR Maybe viewpoint A requires 10,000 words, and viewpoint B only requires 100 to prove its point. Eitherway WP:UNDUE stinks.