4 ms·
A standard would make zero sense for Rust. It's obvious, because there is only one implementation at present, and Rust's RFC process is already far more open th
by pcwalton 10y ago
A standard would make zero sense for Rust. It's obvious, because there is only one implementation at present, and Rust's RFC process is already far more open than ISO, ECMA, or any other standards group, which are basically pay-to-play.
The way you keep invoking "disreputable maintainers" in your posts attacking Rust speaks volumes, I think.
- dysfunctor 10y agoAnd yet my job hires over a hundred C++ programmers. You are astroturf garbage, rust will never make it big, there ARE memory vulns, and klabnik and you are the last people on earth I'd let out faces to my work. Repulsive deviants
- hak8or 10y agoUh, heh. I have got to say, this is the first time I've seen such genuine anger and hatred towards something as abstract as a programming language and its users.
- steveklabnik 10y ago> there ARE memory vulns If you could report these according to https://www.rust-lang.org/en-US/security.html https://www.rust-lang.org/en-US/security.html , that'd be great. Thanks!
- dysfunctor 10y agoOr...... Wait until someone is stupid enough to use rust for something important, short them, own them, and ride off into the sunset