Update: We talked to Andy Lutomirski who was involved in reverse-engineering the original exploit and tracking down the bug. He says the code path is not trigge

Update: We talked to Andy Lutomirski who was involved in reverse-engineering the original exploit and tracking down the bug. He says the code path is not triggered by regular memory writes; you have to go through ptrace() or /proc/self/mem. Details in this blog post: https://sandstorm.io/news/2016-10-25-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-mitigated https://sandstorm.io/news/2016-10-25-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-... Of course, if you have evidence to the contrary, we'd all like to know about it! (You are technically correct that the writes can come from another thread rather than another process, but the important part is that it has to go through one of those interfaces.)