3 ms·
You are missing the point and mistaking my comment for a partisan one (though I can understand why). My point isn't that Podesta is nice or evil. Only that the
by AvenueIngres 10y ago
You are missing the point and mistaking my comment for a partisan one (though I can understand why). My point isn't that Podesta is nice or evil. Only that the people making the political structure of the US parties (here the Democratic party) are self-aware and cynical about the current situation. I agree that in a vacuum this email alone does not tell you much. You could very well argue that this is not an admission of guilt from Podesta. And that's fine.
However: 1/ the sender isn't a nobody. 2/ there are an amount of other elements that makes it highly unlikely that somehow one of the most influential back office advisor of the Democratic party isn't aware of the very unethical crap that is going on the field.
- maxerickson 10y agoThe Princeton study linked in the email is about the influence that money has in politics, not about unethical crap in the field. So it probably isn't a good link if that is the argument you are making.