4 ms·
You are wrong about that. This is the third or fourth time I've seen this dippy nonsense in print, and I wish it did not persist. Its central sin is that it ob
by harrumph 10y ago
You are wrong about that. This is the third or fourth time I've seen this dippy nonsense in print, and I wish it did not persist. Its central sin is that it obscures the mundane, industrial-based reasons for the tuning standard's emergence.
- zodiac 10y agoI'm sorry for being wrong then, but I'm still a bit confused - which part of the article is inaccurate? > Its central sin is that it obscures the mundane, industrial-based reasons for the tuning standard's emergence. The article claims that tuning standards emerged because pitch inflation lead to problems for singers, is that inaccurate?
- harrumph 10y agoNo apology needed! And yes, the tuning standard emerged from the wishes of the owner of a single mallet instrument factory in Chicago named Deagan. http://richsamuels.com/nbcmm/deagan/index.html http://richsamuels.com/nbcmm/deagan/index.html