I referenced this earlier, but got no answer. It is from 2005. I haven't seen anything after that. "Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information

I referenced this earlier, but got no answer. It is from 2005. I haven't seen anything after that. "Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as Britannica, the venerable standard-bearer of facts about the world around us, according to a study published this week in the journal Nature." https://www.cnet.com/news/study-wikipedia-as-accurate-as-britannica/ https://www.cnet.com/news/study-wikipedia-as-accurate-as-bri... (Please Google a better source for that paper. :-) ) I am willing to believe that "sensitive" information about living (and relative unknown) people along with companies/political parties is being more gamed in Wikipedia today, than ten years ago. I'd just see some good references for that...