I agree. They had their story. At worst but acceptable they could have said that it was an Apple employee. They completely went over the line by naming said emp

I agree. They had their story. At worst but acceptable they could have said that it was an Apple employee. They completely went over the line by naming said employee. The question they should have asked themselves first was: "Does naming this person CONTRIBUTE to the story?" This is clear Journalism 101. The answer was and is clearly "no." The best line of defense for them is they have none. Sometimes I hate the internet and its cache. This is one of those times. Anyone can ruin anyone. The really good news is that it appears he has many people on his side.