No, it's a very common issue brought up within the community that GHC takes a lot of time and memory. That blog post just says that interpreting Haskell can be

No, it's a very common issue brought up within the community that GHC takes a lot of time and memory. That blog post just says that interpreting Haskell can be faster than compiling. I worked with Haskell professionally on a pretty large codebase. It was split up into many separate libraries and binaries. There were a lot of coffee breaks when recompiling. https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/45q90s/is_anything_being_done_to_remedy_the_soul/ https://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/45q90s/is_anything...