3 ms·
> One extreme downside of thinking of your home as an investment vehicle is how poorly it is diversified. It is almost exactly directly correlated to the local
by sedachv 10y ago
> One extreme downside of thinking of your home as an investment vehicle is how poorly it is diversified. It is almost exactly directly correlated to the local job market...and to macro trends like the MBS issues we saw in 2008.
This is what I cannot understand about people who advocate buying homes in the United States for small-time investors - how can you not see this? How does it make any sense to divert almost all of your cash flow into a single, massively leveraged, illiquid investment? Miss a few payments on your mortgage and you are totally wiped out (and without a place to live!). At least stocks can bounce back and maybe you can get 30% back on bad bonds. And no one is stopping you from holding cash or TIPS.
If you are wealthy and a house is a small part of your portfolio the impact of the possible downsides is qualitatively different, but as a small-time investor tying up most of my wealth into home ownership on the hope that "house prices always go up" (which really means treating the future generation as suckers that will pay inflated prices for your home) and that the risk of mortgage default does not exist does not make sense to me.
- hash-set 10y agoI don't think most Americans buy houses as investments. There are other reasons: You usually find yourself in a better neighborhood with fewer hassles if you buy vs. rent. Stocks and bonds aren't any better anymore--the bottom could drop out again anytime and leave you with half or less of what you previously had. We're in a crap storm of epic proportions in this country, but we avoid the reality of it.
- tptacek 10y agoMy experience and intuition suggests that the opposite is true, and that you'll generally end up in nicer places and in better neighborhoods if you rent. Looking at current house rental listings in Oak Park, I see several in nicer neighborhoods that are less than my rent; in other words: I believe I pay a premium to to own here. That was my experience in Ann Arbor as well.
- cmdrfred 10y agoThis isn't the case in most of New Jersey or Pennsylvania. Cost to rent a crappy 2 bedroom apartment (with the people below blowing smoke up into your bedroom) is the same as a 3 bedroom house, property taxes, and insurance. It really is location, location, location as they say.
- tptacek 10y agoCan we test this? I'm ready to be convinced with evidence! Let's use a specific market, and just look at the listings.
- cmdrfred 10y agoWell in my home town you can look at Zillow to see home prices (http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Warrington-PA/56739_rid/150000-225000_price/527-790_mp/40.284632,-75.103913,40.209294,-75.221158_rect/12_zm/ http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Warrington-PA/56739_rid...) all of these are priced to give around or below $1200 mortgage all told (taxes,fees,insurance even if you went in with a low down payment). Here are the apartments that are available (http://www.apartmentguide.com/apartments/Pennsylvania/Warrington/2-beds-1z141y8/ http://www.apartmentguide.com/apartments/Pennsylvania/Warrin...) $1200 is really the minimum for a 2 bedroom apartment here. There are a few that are maybe $100 - $200 lower, but I wouldn't want to live there.