>it touches on a great deal of topics ... it's likely still a great resource for keywords, no? What? No. When a source is that biased, then the "list of topics

>it touches on a great deal of topics ... it's likely still a great resource for keywords, no? What? No. When a source is that biased, then the "list of topics covered" (and the keywords associated with them) do not somehow magically escape that bias; it is not a "great resource" for anything except the viewpoints of r/MensRights