3 ms·
All I did was re-iterate the parent comment in blunt terms No you did not. What you did was restate my comment in broader terms, and then attacked your restat
by whyenot 17y ago
All I did was re-iterate the parent comment in blunt terms
No you did not. What you did was restate my comment in broader terms, and then attacked your restated version of my comment.
I think I get it now:
1) Men's poor choices == men's irrational hangups.
2) Women's poor choices == men's systemic sexism.
Don't put words in my mouth and then attack me for what you said. It's intellectually dishonest, the definition of a strawman argument, and I want no part of it.
- run4yourlives 17y agoI suspect that has something to do with many men avoiding jobs that they think might call their sexual orientation into question. i.e. Many men have an irrational hangup about their perceived sexual status when choosing jobs. The reasons so few women go into CS has little to do with worries about their perceived orientation. i.e. There is another issue - inferred - that keeps women out of CS classes. You are comparing apples and oranges Exactly what words am I putting in your mouth?